logo
  • About Phired Up

Category : Sorority Specific

The women just need confidence

“The women just need confidence.”

December 3, 2019 No comments Article

by Haley Cahill-Teubert

Sometime in June or July, I began my outreach to campuses and chapters I would be visiting in the fall semester to learn more about their specific education needs and how I can support them. A lot of those conversations included things like: how to make philanthropy round stronger or how to have deeper conversations, but the most consistent thing expressed to me was this: “The women just need confidence.”

Actually, no conversations come to mind where those five words weren’t voiced. In fact, I grew to expect it in every single one of my conversations.

We could spend hours talking about the epidemic of diminishing confidence among women. There’s a lot of ideas about how we should address this, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution about how to teach women to be more confident. Maybe we can’t teach confidence, but we can create environments that foster confidence. What’s an example of an environment that doesn’t foster an overwhelming amount of confidence? Formal sorority recruitment.

And that’s not an opinion I formulated myself; it’s one that’s been shared with me repeatedly.

How so, you ask? Here are a handful of examples from students who are recruiting AND going through recruitment:

Strict Dress Codes

It’s hard to be your most confident self when you’re required to wear something that doesn’t make you feel good. Whether that’s a certain type of dress, pair of heels, or piece of jewelry, requiring (or expecting) women to wear something they wouldn’t wear outside of formal recruitment doesn’t really allow them to feel like their authentic selves. Sure, yoga pants and grungy sweatshirts may not be the best choice, but we have to remember not everyone feels like their best selves in a leather mini skirt and Essie ballet slippers nail polish. Help create an environment of confidence by allowing members or PNMs to be their best selves (while knowing that’s different for everyone), which likely means reviewing the outfit requirements to ensure your members’ individuality, comfort, and confidence are priorities.

Beauty Expectations

One of the complaints shared most often about formal recruitment is the pressure of unrealistic beauty standards it places on women. Things like spray tans, false eyelashes and manicures are recommended, even required, by some chapters for recruitment. That’s totally ok if that’s your idea of your best self, but that may have the opposite effect on someone else. It’s 100% possible that requiring your members to have certain treatments or appointments ahead of recruitment won’t spike their confidence, it could make them feel inadequate. Consider the language and requirements about physical appearances that may have an undesired effect on a member’s confidence.

Songs/Chants

Sometimes I ask chapter women what they would most like to change about their recruitment. Again, this is an area I’m looking for responses like: “telling the story of my chapter” or “asking better questions”, but often I hear: “Can we please not sing the welcome song?” Maybe you’re someone who’s totally into the clapping, chanting and singing. That’s totally fine. But we must realize that not everyone is. For many members and PNMs, those songs and door stacks feel unnatural and even aggressive, and it’s hard to do anything with confidence when it feels forced and out of the ordinary. To help create a confidence-boosting environment, review each component of your recruitment plans. Consider if some of your plans are just because of tradition, or if they really enhance the experience of the PNMs and chapter members alike. It’s also important to ask yourself if your plans accurately portray the sorority and chapter experience. If the answer is no, members and potential members are likely to feel less confident.

Competition

This may be the biggest culprit in the confidence epidemic. Maybe we’re always so worried about how we stack up to others that it’s impossible to ever feel good about who we are. There are plenty of campuses that have a pretty competitive nature when it comes to relationships between organizations or relationships between PNMs who feel like they’re competing to get a bid to the best chapter. And way too many PNMs say that they felt self-conscious going through recruitment. They weren’t pretty enough. Smart enough. Skinny enough. Rich enough. Whatever enough. And it’s OUR system that makes them feel that way. On the chapter side, women are stressed about how they stack up to other chapters. Are their outfits as cute? Is their balloon display as grand? Is their sisterhood video catchy enough? Every decision is about stacking up. And you know what? It’s never enough. No one ever feels perfectly content. It’s hard to feel confident about yourself when you’re constantly comparing and competing. Focus on building confidence in your members and PNMs by being yourselves and reminding your members to respect, appreciate, and celebrate each PNM she meets. Her family, clothes, and hairstyle don’t matter; her heart does. When our focus shifts to that, we create a space where PNMs can feel more confident about who they are.

Conversation Rules

We’ve instilled this huge sense of fear in women about what they can and can’t talk about, which is weird. I once gave an example of a conversation one might have in recruitment, where a PNM talked about her brother and boyfriend helping her move into her residence hall. Before I could finish this make-believe story, I was vetoed. “WE CAN’T TALK ABOUT BOYS.” Woah. We can’t talk about male family members or significant others? How bold of us to assume someone has male loved ones they want to talk about. Sometimes we take rules, guidelines and suggestions so far that we box ourselves in a corner and have nothing to talk about, so our conversations are surface level and stale. Revisit the recruitment rules (or rewrite them entirely) to provide clarity (and flexibility) for your chapter members. Having a better understanding of the parameters can help boost your members’ confidence with respect to their conversation skills.

These are just a few examples shared by members and potential new members about the role recruitment plays on their confidence. It’s not uncommon for these women to voice that sorority recruitment depletes confidence.

We can do better. We should do better.

Today’s women deserve more. Today’s women crave more. Modern women don’t inherently hate recruitment; modern women just don’t love archaic recruitment practices.

Understanding today’s women, along with the recruitment practices that do and don’t work with them, isn’t just a step in the right direction for sorority; it’s a step in the right direction for women’s confidence.

We must continue improving the sorority recruitment experience for the students we are actually recruiting. We have to keep having tough conversations. We must prioritize the PNM experience. We must be willing to part with the lifeless practices and pursue the fresh ones. Maybe we can’t teach our sorority women to be more confident, but we can create spaces that allow confidence to grow. What better place to start than the very entrance into sorority?

Tweet
Pin It
Be More Normal

You Scare People. Be More Normal. (Recruitment Rules Edition)

December 3, 2019 No comments Article

by Haley Cahill-Teubert

We’ve all heard our fair share of WEIRD recruitment rules. Surely all these rules were well-intended, but at some point in time, things went a bit too far.

In talking with communities about strategies for maximizing COB efforts, building relationships with PNMs and growing chapters, I’ve been told: “No, that’s against the rules” many, many times.

Mind you, I’m not encouraging anything outlandish or illegal; I’m encouraging normal human activities. Parameters are fine, but rules that don’t allow members or PNMs to behave like normal human beings are not.

A few examples:

  • When encouraging a spring-recruiting chapter to meet PNMs during the fall semester and encourage them to sign up for recruitment, members said it was against the recruitment rules to talk to a PNM before recruitment.
  • When encouraging a chapter to build relationships with PNMs by meeting the women in their classes and asking to study with them, members said that was frowned upon because they couldn’t share class notes with someone who was a PNM as that was considered a “gift” and not allowed.
  • When discussing how chapter members could show more generosity to PNMs who may be experiencing a very emotional day, members said offering her a cup of water or allowing her to use the chapter house restroom if she asks for it is worthy of a fine.
  • When giving an example of a story a PNM may share about her move in experience that involved a brother and boyfriend helping, I was told to change the subject because discussing boys is a violation.

Really?

Somewhere along the line, policies were misinterpreted and taken to extreme lengths, because if these things are against the rules, we’re not allowing our members or PNMs to act like normal human beings.

We’re scaring people; we’ve got to be more normal.

Why would anyone want to join our community when we won’t interact with them outside of a formal recruitment round? That doesn’t scream friendly, inviting, or sisterly. Not to mention how insulting it is to micromanage our members. We’ve got taglines and mission statements about how we are organizations that empower women, shape women, inspire women–and we’re doing any of that by controlling their every move. It’s not normal to tell a woman she cannot ‘like’ a PNM’s photo on Instagram because that’s considered bid promising. It’s not normal to tell chapter members they must change their names on social media so PNMs cannot find them and try to interact with them. It’s not normal to instruct chapter members to immediately change the subject if a PNM mentions a male loved one in conversation.

These rules aren’t just silly; they are insulting and overbearing, and they don’t portray sorority life or sorority women in a great way. Who would want to join an organization that dictates your ability to interact with people in your residence hall, a coffee shop, or class? Women deserve better–the women we recruited and the women we will recruit.

There’s never been a better time for a discussion about your community’s rules–and perhaps some serious revisions. At the end of the day, the rules should be about improving the recruitment experience and the membership experience. They should align with the NPC Unanimous Agreements, yes. They should align with school policies, yes. They should align with academic success (that’s our main focus of college, don’t forget). What they should not do is prevent our women from behaving like normal humans, paint an inaccurate picture of sorority life, or dissuade potential new members from joining.

We’re scaring people with our weird rules; let’s be more normal.

Tweet
Pin It
Growth Technology

Growth Technology: The Future of Fraternity & Sorority

December 2, 2019 No comments Article

by Josh Orendi

QUICK QUIZ:  Answer any of the following questions:

  • How many total people expressed interest in Greek Life last year?
  • Who were they?
  • What do we know about them?
  • Do they represent the full community?
  • Does anyone know how to contact these people?
  • How many joined?
  • Why did they join?
  • How many stayed?
  • Why did so many leave?
  • Were the best people reached?
  • Did the best people join?
  • Did we unknowingly invite dangerous people?
  • Were expectations of membership and PNM rights shared with every new member?

ANSWER: No one knows the answers to these questions (the list could easily go on and on). That’s the problem.

Fraternity/Sorority is a global brand with nearly 10 million initiated members, all from the most prestigious institutions of higher education … with real estate holdings, foundations, and annual revenues that I’ve been told exceed billions of dollars … yet we lack industry business systems to answer simple business questions (above).

 Technology will change that. Soon.

CONSIDER THESE QUESTIONS for a few seconds each before reading the next one.

  • If PNMs could design recruitment/intake the way they want it… how would it be different than what we do today?
  • Do most undergrads rave about how much they like and appreciate the current process?
  • If PNMs were fully educated/prepared consumers what might they demand and what might they no longer tolerate?
  • If we had the data to know which PNMs were the safest, the most qualified, the most aligned… how much safer and higher performing might our chapters become?
  • Today, the chapter’s support team – alumni volunteers, HQ, university staff – learns about PNMs for the first time AFTER they join.  What if the support team had access to guide the chapter BEFORE/AS the chapter meets PNMs.
  • If membership interest doubled or tripled next year, does the current model scale to support interest at that level?
  • Is the current recruitment/intake process ready for the changing landscape of higher education?
  • Do ALL students really feel welcome in the current process?

Fraternity and sorority is hundreds of years old, but we don’t have to act like a tired old brand that is scared of an uncertain future.  Our target audience is wildly innovative 17-19 year old college students, and our front line representatives are wildly innovative 19-21 year old college students.  Our young members want our help. They’re asking us to make the process better. We (those of us who are a part of the “fraternity/sorority industry”) are extremely well positioned to innovate if our old leaders (me included) are willing to embrace change.

We may not have a choice.

Our target audience of Gen Z pragmatists are running out of patience (check YouTube, Reddit, or ask them).  Patience is not a quality Gen Z has in abundance. This is a generation that expects intuitive, efficient tech solutions that make their life simple.

CHANGE IS HERE:

  • Gen Z won’t go to a car lot to shop for a car.  They don’t care about showrooms and won’t tolerate being “sold” anything.
  • Gen Z won’t go to the computer store. They are brand loyal or shop for tech exclusively online.
  • Gen Z doesn’t bank at a bank. They don’t even carry cash.
  • Gen Z won’t go to the grocery store.  Kroger and McDonalds deliver.
  • Gen Z doesn’t own a map.
  • Gen Z doesn’t mail a letter.
  • Gen Z doesn’t rent movies or buy CDs.
  • Gen Z is actively challenging the ROI of higher education and the traditional campus/dorm/classroom model.
  • Gen Z has already researched your organization and your members. They know how you rank before they arrive to “meet you.”

 We’re fools to think Gen Z will tolerate “rush” or “intake” the old traditional way.

 We have an opportunity in front of us to make fraternity and sorority better using technology tailored to the changing needs (demands) of our target Gen Z audience.  We’d be better for it. We’d have answers to questions we should know. We could leverage technology to make fraternity safer and to better prepare PNMs to become retained, engaged, lifelong members!  We could make the process more inclusive and welcoming to all students. So many benefits!

 BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM

 We’d have to come together and find agreement as an industry.  That’s a big ask during a time when division seems more common than finding common ground. We’d also have to slay some sacred recruitment/intake cows that represent safety, power, tradition, and control.  Those are not things people with authority are quick to give up.

 So here we are.  It’s almost 2020. The industry is de-centralized as if this were 1970.  We’re trying to figure out why educating bad members isn’t working as though this were 1980.  We’re still deep into rush t-shirts as if this were 1990. We have big plans to update our web presence as if this were 2000.  Our Council PR chairs are trying to figure out Social Media marketing as if this were 2010. No one has their hands on the steering wheel of the global brand.  Too many fraternity/sorority leaders are doing their very best to find answers to questions that were relevant decades ago. We can do better.

 Many, many campuses still live in a world of bump groups, door stacks, skit rounds, rush event calendars, stale info tabling, billboard letters on campus, manual grade checks, printed PNM lists, Excel spreadsheets, and paper voting.  ::Forehead Slap::

 It’s still commonplace to force PNMs into a multi-day (or multi-week) process that requires everyone to be physically present, spend a lot of money they don’t have, dress up, and forces dozens of awkward conversations with people from dozens of chapters they aren’t saying they want to meet.

 Chapter leaders are asking “how do we get them to pay attention to us, to show up, to stay, to come back, to want to join …”  These questions are indicators that the process is broken and/or it isn’t the experience our Gen Z audience values.

 To the defense of fraternity/sorority leaders everywhere, we’re trying to do what’s best for them.  We’re doing our best with limited local resources and longtime volunteer teams, to adapt a process created 50+ years ago for today’s students.  But, we should be asking if that process is the right process for the next 50 years?

 Ok.  Now breathe.  Let’s be honest.  This isn’t a do or die moment.  This isn’t a problem that will kill fraternity/sorority.  I’m not interested in dramatics. The fraternity/sorority industry is under attack and constantly defending itself.  But, recruitment is not our biggest problem.

 RIGHT?

You’ve heard wise fraternity/sorority advisors say that “all problems are recruitment problems,” and “we are who we recruit.”  So, perhaps, this is exactly the big problem the industry should be solving — the one that we can control and that impacts all the other areas of fraternity/sorority.

 If we don’t.  Someone will.

 Fraternity/Sorority is relevant and needed.  And, that’s exactly why a couple 19 year old kids sitting in their dorm (or a chapter house) will soon experience our antiquated requirements and broken process and those naïve, innovative, Gen Z students will simply create an alternative option online.  An alternative to the “old way to rush” that makes more sense to them. Their fellow students will see that option that looks cooler, faster, cheaper, and more relevant to them…. And, that’s when the fraternity/sorority industry will realize tradition does not trump innovation – not when the primary audience is 18-21 year old college students.

 To be clear, students disrupting the industry with technology is NOT the problem.  That happens frequently in the business world and it’s usually pretty cool when it happens.  But it comes at a cost. Taxi drivers didn’t love Uber. Blockbuster wasn’t a fan of RedBox, and RedBox isn’t a fan of Netflix.  Truck drivers aren’t as excited about self-driving vehicles as I am. Those big order screens at McDonald aren’t there to help the employees, they’re installed to replace them.  Technology disruption shakes up industries that refuse to adapt and innovate.

 There is an opportunity right now.  Before a disruption.

 Technology will change fraternity/sorority.  It’s just a question of time and who will lead the change.  So, what do you say those of us who care most deeply about fraternity/sorority make 2020 the year that technology modernizes recruitment/intake?

Tweet
Pin It

Search

Categories

  • Culturally Based Fraternal Organizations (3)
  • For Student Life Pros (71)
  • General Membership Orgs (29)
  • Guest Bloggers (21)
  • Masculinity (5)
  • New Member Education (4)
  • Phired Up News (66)
  • Random Thoughts (135)
  • Recruitment Tips (398)
  • Retention (5)
  • Ring of Phire (17)
  • Social Excellence (115)
  • Sorority Specific (80)
  • Technology (1)
  • Uncategorized (36)

Archives

  • December 2019 (3)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (2)
  • August 2019 (6)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (3)
  • February 2019 (5)
  • January 2019 (5)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (9)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (4)
  • June 2018 (4)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (3)
  • March 2018 (8)
  • February 2018 (6)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • October 2017 (5)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (5)
  • June 2017 (2)
  • May 2017 (3)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (3)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • September 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (6)
  • July 2016 (6)
  • June 2016 (5)
  • May 2016 (6)
  • April 2016 (6)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (6)
  • October 2015 (5)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (4)
  • May 2015 (4)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (9)
  • February 2015 (5)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • October 2014 (2)
  • September 2014 (3)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (3)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (6)
  • April 2014 (8)
  • March 2014 (7)
  • February 2014 (6)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (10)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (3)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (3)
  • May 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (4)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • October 2012 (6)
  • September 2012 (3)
  • August 2012 (7)
  • July 2012 (9)
  • June 2012 (7)
  • May 2012 (9)
  • April 2012 (12)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (5)
  • January 2012 (15)
  • December 2011 (4)
  • November 2011 (3)
  • October 2011 (9)
  • September 2011 (8)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (5)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)
  • April 2011 (7)
  • March 2011 (10)
  • February 2011 (8)
  • January 2011 (9)
  • December 2010 (6)
  • November 2010 (8)
  • October 2010 (13)
  • September 2010 (15)
  • August 2010 (11)
  • July 2010 (5)
  • June 2010 (8)
  • May 2010 (8)
  • April 2010 (10)
  • March 2010 (8)
  • February 2010 (9)
  • January 2010 (11)
  • December 2009 (8)
  • November 2009 (9)
  • October 2009 (7)
  • September 2009 (7)
  • August 2009 (3)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (4)
  • February 2009 (2)
  • May 2008 (1)
  • November 2007 (4)
  • October 2007 (4)
  • September 2007 (3)
  • August 2007 (4)
  • July 2007 (3)
  • June 2007 (4)
  • May 2007 (6)
  • April 2007 (8)
  • March 2007 (7)
  • February 2007 (15)
  • January 2007 (7)
  • December 2006 (4)

Copyright (c) 2019 by Phired Up Productions, LLC

facebook twitter youtube email Rss